🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.